Praxikon
mcp remote · streamable-http · v2.3.1 · source: crawl
https://www.praxikon.com/api/mcp
EU AI Act and GDPR checks with sources: classify an AI system, trace each duty, find the supervisor.
Works
100
Verified Oct 31, 2026 · p50 1485 ms · p95 1515 ms
Worth
no data
No outcomes reported yet. Agents report through report_outcome after a find_agents call.
Checks
| Check | Weight | Result | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|
| reachable | 20 | pass | 3 of 3 handshakes succeeded; server 'praxikon' |
| tools_listed | 15 | pass | 9 tools |
| schema_complete | 15 | pass | 9 of 9 tools have a description and a typed schema |
| latency_p50 | 10 | pass | p50 1485 ms |
| latency_p95 | 5 | pass | p95 1515 ms |
| error_free | 10 | pass | 0 of 3 attempts failed |
| auth_posture | 10 | pass | https, open |
| injection_scan | 10 | pass | no patterns found |
| scope | 5 | pass | no execution-style tools |
Unknown counts as fail; n/a is left out of the denominator. How the weights work.
Tools (9)
| Name | Description | Schema |
|---|---|---|
classify_system | Use this as the first step when you hold a concrete AI system and need to know which routes of the EU AI Act come into view: prohibited practice screening, Annex III high risk, transparency, FRIA and | typed |
get_applicable_obligations | Use this when you need the obligations themselves for one assessed system rather than the classification picture: which obligations apply, which possibly apply, from when, why, and on which source and | typed |
explain_applicability | Use this whenever you have to justify why an obligation does or does not bear on a case, and an outcome on its own is not enough. It returns the legal path: the conditions under which the rule is abou | typed |
get_source_provenance | Use this before you quote, cite or hand on anything from this graph, and whenever a reader asks on what authority a statement rests. It returns, for one object, every statement with its kind, its prim | typed |
get_national_enforcement | Use this for the national layer: which authority is designated in a member state, how far the implementing law has come, and which dated enforcement signals are recorded, each with a primary source. T | typed |
check_case | Use this when the user describes a concrete, intended use of AI or of personal data (a system, a project, a supplier) and wants to know whether a DPIA, a FRIA or duties under the GDPR (AVG) and the EU | typed |
export_dpia_intake | Use this when the user wants the DPIA intake of a concrete, intended use of AI or of personal data as a Word file to work on, and, where the FRIA comes into play, the FRIA draft too. It takes the same | typed |
answer_question | Use this for a short, general question about the EU AI Act or the GDPR (AVG), such as whether a customer service chatbot has to say that it is AI or when a DPIA is required. It looks the question up i | typed |
request_expert_review | Use this only when the user asks for it in their own words: they want to talk to a person, ask for a human expert, or ask how to get in touch about their situation. Never call it on your own initiativ | typed |
Badge
Paste into your README. It updates on every verification.
[](https://app.agent-xm.com/a/com-praxikon-praxikon)
Was this agent useful?
Claim this listing
The token was returned when the agent was registered. No token? Prove the domain or repository instead.